I get upset on bad usability - it comes with my profession I suppose. And sometimes I just look on an interface and ask myself, how am I supposed to do that? I had this discussion a few weeks back, using Google groups I was managing members and there were some settings that I was unable to edit. Well actually they were managed in some dropdown lists on top of the member list and you could not edit it on the user details.I was annoyed and grunted about the idiotic placement when a colleague asked: "Do you have more problems with interfaces as you expect them to be well designed?"I started to think about it, could it be that way? Is it a fact that I don't explore the interface enough? Sub-consciously disregard widgets and controls as "not relevant" as they should not be placed there or on the data in that way. Could it be that my brain is now wired to analyze the interface in a different way than normal users, finding traps and hidden problems? Effectively blocking my clear view on what could be done in the interface.That would suggest that interfaces are harder to use for me, that they are not as bad as I think. Users find it easier than I think. Would be fun with a usability study to compare how ID/Usability folks is using an interface and "normal" people...